What is reductio ad absurdum argument?
What is reductio ad absurdum argument?
Reductio ad absurdum is also known as “reducing to an absurdity.” It involves characterizing an opposing argument in such a way that it seems to be ridiculous, or the consequences of the position seem ridiculous.
What type of argument is reductio ad absurdum?
Reductio ad absurdum is a mode of argumentation that seeks to establish a contention by deriving an absurdity from its denial, thus arguing that a thesis must be accepted because its rejection would be untenable.
What does reductio ad absurdum mean and how is it used in statistics?
Reductio Ad Absurdum Aristotle came up with a fantastic way of evaluating the truth of a claim: you momentarily accept the claim as true and see if doing so causes any problems. It’s called reductio ad absurdum, Latin for reduction to absurdity.
What is the meaning of ad absurdum?
to the point of absurdity
Definition of ad absurdum : to the point of absurdity not slavishly imitate it ad absurdum— Frank Weitenkampf.
How do you use reductio ad absurdum in a sentence?
For some reason, this strikes me as the reductio ad absurdum of the whole project. Opposition to stem-cell research is the reductio ad absurdum of the right-to-life argument. It’s an entertaining reductio ad absurdum against those who complain about the unfairness of low-cost production by foreigners.
What is the meaning of reductio ad absurdum?
Definition of reductio ad absurdum. 1: disproof of a proposition by showing an absurdity to which it leads when carried to its logical conclusion. 2: the carrying of something to an absurd extreme.
re·duc·tio ad ab·sur·dum | \\ ri-ˈdək-tē-ˌō-ˌad-əb-ˈsər-dəm , -ˈdək-sē-ō-, -shē-, -ˈzər-\\. 1 : disproof of a proposition by showing an absurdity to which it leads when carried to its logical conclusion. 2 : the carrying of something to an absurd extreme.
What are the best books on reductio ad absurdum?
J. M. Lee, “The Form of a reductio ad absurdum ,” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol. 14 (1973), pp. 381-86. Gilbert Ryle, “Philosophical Arguments,” Colloquium Papers, vol. 2 (Bristol: University of Bristol, 1992), pp. 194-211.
Is Sheldon engaging in reductio ad absurdum?
Sheldon: He’s engaging in reductio ad absurdum. It’s the logical fallacy of extending someone’s argument to ridiculous proportions and then criticizing the result. And I do not appreciate it. (“The Dumpling Paradox.”